Subscribe to Furniture Today
Research Store
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

Share this on
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

Alternative stores grab 13% of bedding purchases

By Dana French -- Furniture Today, November 7, 2004

Approximately 1.5 million households purchased bedding through an alternative channel last year. The channel, defined in this survey as including all direct-to-consumer, warehouse membership clubs and discount department stores, accounts for 13% of all bedding purchases in 2002 and 2003. Of the households that purchased bedding at an alternative channel, 24% also shopped for a mattress at a furniture store and 31% shopped at a bedding specialty store.

Consumers buying at alternative channels represent a missed opportunity for furniture stores and bedding specialty stores. Of the households that purchased bedding at an alternative channel, 24% also shopped for a mattress at a furniture store and 31% shopped at a specialist. Last year, that translated into more than 350,000 missed purchases, representing more than $150 million in lost revenue.

As in other channels, queen mattresses are the most popular. More than two-fifths of all mattresses purchased through alternative channels are queen-sized. The channel accounts for 11% of all queen purchases. Alternative-buying households spend a median of $400 on their queen purchase, lower than the median of $535 at specialty stores and the median of $600 at furniture stores.

Alternative channels own a significant portion of the twin market, accounting for more than one-fifth of all twin purchases. Alternative buyers spend a median of $397 on their twin purchase, in line with the median of $395 on a twin at a specialist and significantly higher than the median of $225 at furniture stores.

Much like shoppers in other channels, shopping time is short for buyers in alternative channels — 40% spent less than one month shopping before making a purchase and 20% spent one to three months shopping.

Replacement cycles for old mattresses are shorter for alternative buyers than both specialty store buyers and furniture store buyers. Only one-fifth of households purchasing through an alternative channel were replacing a mattress that was 10 or more years old, compared with 51% of furniture store buyers and 42% of specialty store buyers.

Generally speaking, alternative channels are faster than furniture stores at delivery, and on par with delivery times at specialists.

Households that buy at alternative channels place more importance on price and selection than households that buy in furniture stores and bedding specialty stores.

Add-on sales present an opportunity for alternative channels. More than half of households that purchased bedding through the channel also bought a bed, and about one-third also purchased a dresser, chest and nightstand. Between 37% and 48% of the add-on bedroom purchases were made in alternative channels. Furniture stores captured between 20% and 36% of the add-on buys.

Defining the consumer

Households buying in alternative channels cannot be defined by income or age. While bedding-buyers at specialists are skewed towards middle incomes and furniture store buyers are slightly skewed towards incomes under $75,000, alternative channels appear to have no definite income niche. Household incomes of alternative channel buyers are distributed fairly evenly — 27% are under $40,000; 38% are between $40,000 and $74,999; and, 35% have incomes of $75,000 or more. The channel captured the bedding business of 14% of higher income households — those with incomes of $75,000 or more.

Similarly, alternative channels have no significant skew towards a certain age group. In 2002 and 2003, 38% of alternative channel buyers were baby boomers, in line with the boomer's portion of specialty store buyers, but less than the group's portion of furniture store buyers. Alternative channels are most popular with older baby boomers and empty nesters, those aged between 49 and 68 this year. Older baby boomers spend a median of $630 on bedding at alternative channels and empty nesters spend a median of $310.

There are some significant buyer groups, however. Hispanics, the largest ethnic minority in the United States today, show a strong tendency to buy in alternative channels. In fact, 21% of all bedding-buying Hispanic households purchased through alternative channels in 2002 and 2003. By 2050, the U.S. Census Bureau projects that Hispanics will comprise nearly one-fourth of the nation's population. Hispanics spend a median of $390 on their total bedding purchase at alternative channels.

Alternative channels account for 13% of bedding purchases by White households and 17% of bedding purchases by African-American households. White households spend a median of $375 on bedding through alternative channels and African-American households spend a median of $355.

Regionally, households living in the West are the strongest alternative channel customers. Westerners spend a median of $400 on their total bedding purchase.

Actual time between order and delivery
Bought at a... Alternative channel Furniture store Specialty store
Less than one week 30% 30% 36%
One week 40% 30% 30%
Two to three weeks 20% 20% 22%
Four or more weeks 10% 20% 12%

Share of bedding purchases¹

1. The percentage of the total number of mattresses purchased at each channel, NOT the percentage of total dollars spent.
2. Alternative channels include direct-to-consumer, warehouse membership clubs and discount department stores.
3. Other includes department stores, military PXs, furniture rental stores, interior designers and designer showrooms, among others.
Furniture stores 38%
Specialists 30%
Alternative channels2 13%
Other3 19%
Share of purchases,* by size
Alternative channels All other channels
*The percentage of the total number of mattresses purchased, by size, at each channel, NOT the percentage of total dollars spent.
Twin 21% 79%
Full/double 18% 82%
Queen 11% 89%
King 11% 89%
Sizes bought in alternative channels*
% of households buying each size
*12% of households purchased more than one mattress in 2002/2003.
Twin 24%
Full/double 22%
Queen 43%
King 18%
California King 2%
Daybed 4%
Bunkbed 6%

Distribution channels

By race/ethnicity
% of households that bought at White African-American Hispanic
Furniture stores 36% 50% 29%
Bedding specialists 31% 17% 21%
Alternative channels1 13% 17% 21%
Other2 20% 16% 29%
By region
% of households that bought at Northeast Midwest South West
Furniture stores 32% 43% 42% 27%
Bedding specialists 29% 26% 32% 33%
Alternative channels1 14% 13% 14% 16%
Other2 25% 18% 12% 24%
By generation
% of households that bought at Generation Y Generation X Younger baby boomer Older baby boomer Empty nester Senior senior
Furniture stores 33% 40% 39% 43% 19% 34%
Bedding specialists 44% 28% 34% 16% 43% 34%
Alternative channels1 17% 16% 10% 18% 17% 15%
Other2 6% 16% 17% 23% 21% 17%
By generation
By household income
% of households that bought at Under $40,000 $40,000 to $74,999 $75,000 or more
1. Alternative channels include direct-to-consumer, warehouse membership clubs and discount department stores.
2. Other includes department stores, military PX's, furniture rental stores, interior designers and designer showrooms, among others.
Furniture stores 37% 37% 37%
Bedding specialists 28% 34% 27%
Alternative channels1 14% 13% 14%
Other2 21% 16% 22%
Where alternative channel members rank on the 2003 Top 25 Bedding Retailers
Rank Company Homebase 2003 estimated bedding sales in $ millions
1. About 14% of Select Comfort's 2003 retail sales came from direct marketing, 4% from the Internet and 82% from stores.
2. About 62% of 1-800-Mattress's 2003 retail sales came from tele-retailing, 3% from the Internet and 35% from stores.
Figures are based on estimated 2003 sales of conventional mattresses and boxsprings, as well as foam bedding, futons, air beds, adjustable beds and waterbeds. Estimated figures do not include sales of headboards, frames, mattress pads, pillows and other related products. All sales information, except for that supplied by publicly held companies that break out bedding sales, are Furniture/Today market research estimates. All data are for calendar 2003.
1 Select Comfort1 Minneapolis $428.2
4 Sam's Club Bentonville, Ark. $240.0
17 1-800-Mattress2 Long Island City, N.Y. $87.0
20 Costco Issaquah, Wash. $68.0
22 Wal-Mart Bentonville, Ark. $65.0
23 Tempur-Pedic Lexington, Ky. $60.0
25 Big Lots Columbus, Ohio $58.0

Spending at alternative channels

Amount spent, by size Medians
Alternative channels All distribution channels
Twin $397 $300
Full/double $400 $375
Queen $400 $500
King $550 $800
Queen spending
Under $300 18%
$300 – $399 23%
$400 – $499 29%
$500 – $699 6%
$700 – $999 12%
$1,000 or more 12%

Source: Furniture/Today's 2003/2004 Consumer Buying Trends Survey

RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

Share this on
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

Resource Center

Featured Company


Related Resources

Advertisement
More Content
  • Blogs
  • Photos

Mike Root

From A Rep's Perspective

Mike Root, President, Furniture Sales of Mid-America
May 31, 2011
The Hot New Marketing Idea Furniture Retailers Are Chasing
After my last post, Sev Ritchie from Web4Retail called me up to discuss the...
More

Mike Root

From A Rep's Perspective

Mike Root, President, Furniture Sales of Mid-America
May 31, 2011
The Hot New Marketing Idea Furniture Retailers Are Chasing
The Hot New Marketing Idea Furniture Retailers Are ChasingAfter my last post, Sev...
More

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Atlanta International Gift & Home Furnishings Market

Here is a selection of products shown at this month's International Gift & Home Furnishings Market here.

Networking at the 13th annual F/T Leadership Conference

NAPLES, Fla. — Industry executives and guests took the opportunity to network and play golf during down time at Furniture/Today's 13th annual Leadership Conference here this month.
VIEW ALL GALLERIES

Bedding Conference 2012
FT Industry Resources module
eNewsletters
eletter_callout_box_FT2
About Us   |   Advertise   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2012 Sandow Media LLC.All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy