Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Furniture Today
Industry Resources
Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS

Antidumping duties being used for what?

By Furniture Today Staff -- Furniture Today, February 19, 2007

We have watched with great interest the actions of our fellow furniture wholesalers/manufacturers since the imposition of antidumping duties on wood bedroom furniture imported from China. Just a short time ago, we received our first invoices from U.S. Customs for liquidation of entries for that furniture, from 2004 and 2005.

We can respect the motives behind the initial petition — to maintain a competitive playing field. But as the first dollars are being collected and disbursed to the petitioners, we have to ask where our dollars are going. How much has been invested in upgrading plants with new technology to lower the cost of production? How many workers have been retrained in new, efficient processes? How many new production plants have been opened in economically distressed areas to provide jobs for American workers?

Perhaps the more pertinent questions would be focused on just the opposite. How many of the petitioners have actively moved parts purchasing or full-scale production to Asia? How many are funding and investing in new facilities in Asia, to garner the benefits of efficient Asian manufacturing, while avoiding the very duties they lobbied to have imposed? How many threw their lot in with Lifestyle and opened their showrooms during the Forbidden City Furniture Show, focused exclusively on Chinese imports? How many of our dollars are going to support profitability driven by Asian imports, rather than to protecting American jobs?

It gives us pause to wonder that a small group can inflict so much disruption and turmoil on an entire industry, yet have no accountability for demonstrating that the basis of their complaint has been mitigated or improved because of their actions.

We'll pay our duty because we obey the law, and believe in the American way of life. We might not have even been so reluctant to pay them if we believed that we were enhancing the life of the American labor force. But we pay them with great reluctance when we believe they are enriching only a small group of individuals.

Frederick G. Rohrbach, president and owner, and William S. Cubberley, director of business development, A-America

Contact us

Send letters to: Letter to the editor, P.O. Box 2754, High Point, N.C. 27261. Letters also may be faxed to (336) 605-1143 or e-mailed to jmcintosh@reedbusiness.com. Please include your name, company, address and a phone number.

Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS
Related Content
Also by Staff Staff

Reed Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement

Related Microsite Content

Related Links

  • No Related Content Available

research marketing module
Advertisement
Showtime Product Submissions
eNewsletters
Furniture Today eDaily
Furniture Today eClassifieds
Bedding Today
Furniture Today Green
Casual Living eWeekly
Home Accents Today eWeekly
Home Accents Today Product Line
Home Textiles Today Extra
Hospitality Furnishings Today
Gifts & Dec Direct
Gifts & Dec Product Wire
Kids Today eWeekly
Playthings Extra



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertise   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites