Matt Firm, Tempur Sealy square off in lawsuits
April 13, 2017,
Mattress Firm filed suit on March 30, alleging that Tempur Sealy has engaged in “a systematic campaign aimed at extracting retribution for their losses” after a sharp drop in Tempur Sealy’s market capitalization that followed news of the impending Mattress Firm/Tempur Sealy split earlier this year.
“As to product deliveries,” the suit continues, “Tempur Sealy failed to comply with obligations to deliver product as to time, location and specifications, resulting in lost sales and frustrated Mattress Firm customers. Tempur Sealy even embarked on a nationwide internet advertising campaign implying that shoppers should avoid ‘bait and switch’ sales tactics and buy direct from the manufacturer instead of Mattress Firm.
“Tempur Sealy’s sharp tactics violated the parties’ written agreements and interfered with Mattress Firm’s customer relationships,” the suit continues. “Mattress Firm therefore seeks an award of damages, declaratory relief, and attorney’s fees.”
Asked for comment on these charges, Tempur Sealy said it does not comment on ongoing litigation to which the company is a party.
But about one week later, Tempur-Pedic North America and Sealy Mattress Co. filed suit against Mattress Firm, contending that it is violating the terms of an agreement to wind-down and terminate the parties’ business relationship on April 3, 2017.
“The agreements required Mattress Firm to cease and desist from the use of Tempur Sealy trademarks by no later than April 3, 2017,” the Tempur Sealy suit says. “However, since April 3, 2017, Mattress Firm has failed, as promised, to: (a) take down all signs in its stores referring to Tempur-Pedic or Sealy; (b) remove all references to Tempur-Pedic and Sealy from its website; and (c) cease all Mattress Firm advertising referring to Tempur-Pedic and Sealy.
“Mattress Firm’s conduct has caused and will continue to cause Tempur-Sealy irreparable harm,” the suit continues. “As a result … Tempur-Sealy is entitled to injunctive relief to stop Mattress Firm from continuing to exploit Tempur-Sealy’s trademarks in violation of its contractural obligations, and federal and state law.”
Mattress Firm has been conducting a “once-in-a-lifetime” sale, promising savings on brands including Tempur-Pedic, Stearns & Foster and Sealy, brands in the Tempur Sealy portfolio.
Asked for comment on the Mattress Firm lawsuit, Ken Murphy, Mattress Firm’s CEO, made this statement: “Winding down a relationship of this magnitude is a complex process that raises a number of operational challenges. We worked diligently with Tempur Sealy over the past couple of months to resolve those issues as they arose, but it became clear that there were several critical areas where an agreement was not possible. We therefore had no choice but to file a lawsuit … to enforce and define our rights. Tempur Sealy’s subsequent lawsuit addresses those same areas of disagreement, and is merely a continuation of its efforts to prohibit Mattress Firm’s authorized use of their trademarks. The complaints speak for themselves and we do not plan to comment further.”
Most Viewed Articles
Related Content By Author
Mid-August news features acquisitions, Amazon and avenues of growth
Furniture Retail Solutions
Over the past year, our editorial team has been on the road, studying retail – what's working and what challenges even the most established retailers face. Born from these studies is Furniture Retail Solutions – a multi-part series addressing common problems retailers face. Read our first two articles:
RSA Insights & Intelligence
RSA Insights & Intelligence gives you, the retail sales associates, critical intelligence and insights. We make it easier for you to sell by providing actionable tips and key takeaways you can and should use for every sale. Check out our latest two articles:
* Why buying mattresses online is harder than consumers think
* How RSA can capitalize on the adjustable base boom