|  RegisterFree Newsletter Subscription
ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 10 seconds.
Zibb
Subscribe to Furniture Today
Industry Resources

Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (2)

Top retailer doubts our 56% figure on high-end spending

September 12, 2006

This week we reflect upon a very provocative finding about the high end of the market that we shared with you earlier this year: that 56% of all dollars spent on bedding are at price points of $1,000 and up.

That’s what analysis of a broad-based consumer research study we conducted in 2005 told us. And that’s what we told you.

But in the last few weeks, we’ve gotten comments that raise questions about that figure. One of the nation’s top bedding retailers called us and challenged our 56% figure. He was adding up his estimates on high-end bedding sales, based on wholesale shipment figures, and he couldn’t get anywhere close to our number.
My response to him: “We approached this issue from a different perspective. We got our figures from a consumer research study.”

His reply: “The consumers may not be telling you what they are really doing.”

In other words, what they say they are spending is not really what they are spending. Maybe they don’t remember exactly what they spent.

I revisited the issue with our research staff to learn more about the consumer study we conducted. I learned that our 56% figure, which came from a 2005 consumer study, is consistent with a consumer study we conducted a year earlier, which found that 54% of bedding dollars were spent at price points of $1,000 and up.

So the consumers are consistent in what they are telling us. But do they remember what they spent on bedding? Our thought is that they do, since it is a big-ticket purchase.

Our researchers noted that consumers may or may not be accounting for sales taxes they’ve paid in telling us how much they spent on bedding. And we don’t know if consumers are telling us about their total sales ticket — say a sleep set plus pillows — or just the cost of the sleep set. It’s possible the sales tickets they recall include add-on sales.

We will be conducting another major consumer research study later this year, and bedding once again will be one of the categories included. We are eager to see what that study finds.

We also should note that we have gotten some support for our 56% figure from a high-end producer, who says that figure is in the ballpark. And when I recently asked the sales manager for a well-known brand what he thought of our 56% figure, he said it was on target.

I think my retail friend has done me — and all of us — a big favor by suggesting we approach the high-end market from the wholesale shipment side of the equation and see where that takes us. So that will be one of my homework assignments in the months to come.

I’ll let you know what I find out. And I welcome your insights as I fearlessly plunge into the exhilarating but occasionally murky waters of market research.


*For our latest Bedding Today research findings, see our online store at
http://www.reedbusinessstore.com/bedding.html

Posted by David Perry on September 12, 2006 | Comments (2)
Industries:

September 28, 2006
In response to: Top retailer doubts our 56% figure on high-end spending
Undetermined commented:

If you believe in what you do, it's hard showing anything but the best..I spent 3,000 dollars on a mower I use one hour a day. my wife has never used it and I only use it a few months a year! Asking some one to spend 3,000 on a mattress that them and their spouse will use 8 hours a night and year round comes easy..


September 20, 2006
In response to: Top retailer doubts our 56% figure on high-end spending
Undetermined commented:

I, too, doubt the 56% figure on high-end bedding. I would guess that once or twice a week, we hear a customer tell us about the "$10,000 dining room suit" they bought 25 years ago that turns out to be a $25 garage sale item they bought 25 years ago. Or the customer that calls and complains that the mattress set that they purchased from us 7 years ago is "sinking in the middle." And "We paid $2000 for that set, so it should last longer than that!" But once we look at their invoice, we find that it was a $399 queen set. The consumer is very apt at making themselves look larger than they really are... kind of like some retailers!

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the code above:

Advertisement
Submit product intros for Showtime
Advertisement
Furniture Today Subscription Offer - September 2008

eNEWSLETTERS

Furniture Today eDaily
Furniture Today eClassifieds
Bedding Today
Furniture Today Green
Casual Living eWeekly
Home Accents Today eWeekly
Home Accents Today Product Line
Home Textiles Today Extra
Gifts & Dec Direct
Gifts & Dec Product Wire
Kids Today eWeekly
Playthings Extra

About Us   |   Advertise   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites