Subscribe to Furniture Today
Research Store
RSS
Email

Share this on
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

Furloughs as a Viable Alternative to Layoffs

April 24, 2009

Although the economy is sending mixed signals and we’re all hopeful for an uptick, it’s safe to say that we’re not out of the woods just yet.  Employers are still looking for ways to shore up sales and profits and employees continue to worry about job security.  Labor and benefit costs, a substantial expense of any business, always receive close scrutiny in difficult times.  There may be viable expense cutting options that should be considered before resorting to layoffs or a reduction in force (RIF) such as reducing benefits, freezing salaries, or reassigning employees.  Another creative alternative to layoffs which is gaining support is a furlough, or time off without pay for a temporary period.

Managers often consider furloughs when they foresee a temporary downturn; when they must cut expenses but can’t do without the services of their hard to find talent; if they can’t transfer or reassign employees; if they want to avoid rehiring and retraining costs as the business cycle improves; or if they want to avoid hidden costs of layoffs such as severance pay and plummeting workplace morale.

With drastic layoffs continuing, over three million in the last six months, employees would rather take a temporary leave with benefits including possibly unemployment benefits, than be faced with a permanent termination. Many attempt to make good use of the forced time off with volunteer work or training for additional skills.  There is also a sense that management and employees must work together to out run this recession.

The business benefits of a furlough are both tangible and intangible. In addition to immediately cutting costs, many believe that furloughs win additional loyalty from the workforce because management is showing that it is attempting to reduce and spread the pain across the organization.  At the same time the furloughed employees maintain their relationship with the company and are poised to quickly assist in its growth as the recession eases.

Furloughs are not favored by everyone, especially those that argue layoffs are a necessary evil to safeguard the competiveness and viability of the company.  They argue that furloughs can chase away the best talent from an organization, are not well-suited for work that requires a team, and postpones the difficult but inevitable cost cutting.

There are some pitfalls and factors to consider when implementing furloughs including avoiding a stated return to work date which may create an entitlement; Federal and state mandated rights regarding compensation for exempt employees that work a partial day; whether the employee is entitled to unemployment benefits; the scope of employee benefits; vacation and seniority issues; scheduling work to avoid discriminating a class, and the affect of collective bargaining agreements.  Most of these concerns can be addressed by carefully designing the furlough program with the assistance of an attorney or workplace expert.

Furloughs are a creative cost cutting mechanism that should be considered by management, together with other measures, as an alternative to lay offs.

Posted by Jerry Cohen on April 24, 2009 | Comments (5)

May 4, 2009
In response to: Furloughs as a Viable Alternative to Layoffs
Reed Construction Data commented:

Okay, so the economy is tanking even further and the latest news is that commercial construction is picking up....up to what, a 40 year low?
Furloughs? Layoffs? Ask anyone that has been terminated at Reed Construction Data is the company is viable? They were on the blocks last year and couldn't find a buyer, the product is not improved, management has admitted that their Smart Building Index has no value to architects and their BIM offerings continue to be overpriced and hard to find....


May 4, 2009
In response to: Furloughs as a Viable Alternative to Layoffs
JillT commented:

You're kidding right? Employers don't care about employees now or ever have. This is proven out by the way these companies are handling the terminations of dedicated employees....talk to someone at Reed Construction and ask them how their fellow workers were given the boot....better yet, find a former Reed employee and ask him or her about the real reasons behind the layoffs.....could it be that no one is buying the product because it is an overpriced unreliable product that meets no industry standards....ask any architect if they have ever heard of the Smart Building Index..


April 29, 2009
In response to: Furloughs as a Viable Alternative to Layoffs
Jerry Cohen commented:

The point of my post was that if a company must pare expenses to survive this downturn, then before resorting to the drastic step of termination, furloughs should be investigated. Yes, Yuan, all applicable laws must be followed regarding wages, benefits, etc or the employer will end up paying penalties and may be subject to a lawsuit. But that is true in the case of layoffs also. I understand the comment by Eyes Everywhere, but I haven't recently seen any company posting "record profits" and terminating or fulouging employees. And If such profits are being generated I would assume that the company would need all the talent they can get their hands on. Thanks for your thoughts.


April 25, 2009
In response to: Furloughs as a Viable Alternative to Layoffs
Yuan Can Ngyuen commented:

Many retailers are using this tactic to pare expenses and increase the bottom line. The key is getting good advice that complies with all Federal and State laws. Following bad advice merely digs a deeper hole as some are finding out.


April 24, 2009
In response to: Furloughs as a Viable Alternative to Layoffs
Eyes Everywhere commented:

It is disturbing that corporations are using furloughs as a method of increasing profits at the expense of their loyal employees.
When you see companies posting record profits on the one hand, yet furloughing employees, the tactic becomes disingenuous.
So while in some cases where a company might need to use this as a way to survive the economic downturn and save jobs, employees need to be cautious that the company not using this topad profits.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
research marketing module
Advertisement
Casual Living Conference
eNewsletters
eletter_callout_box_FT2


About Us   |   Advertise   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2012 Sandow Media LLC.All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy