ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 20 seconds.
Subscribe to Furniture Today
follow us
RSS
Email

Share this on
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.

May 24, 2006

Economic developers typically are a secretive group — and for good reason. They don’t want to jeopardize potential deals that could bring jobs to an area. But late last fall, two of these officials in the High Point area talked to Furniture/Today about what could be an exciting development in the industry.

Without revealing details, they told us that several Asian furniture and components makers had visited the area in recent months to inquire about setting up some type of manufacturing or distribution. Given the rise of furniture manufacturing in China, that almost sounds too good to be true.

It also makes sense, and here’s why. Already, a number of domestic manufacturers and importers have warehouses in the High Point area to handle imported product. Those facilities help provide an important logistical infrastructure for fill-in orders and repairs. Some, including an MGM Transport facility in Eden, N.C., handle light assembly too.

The result is that importers get the best of both worlds. On the one hand, they get goods made less expensively in Asia. On the other, these domestic facilities provide quick turnaround on repairs and also fulfill smaller orders for customers that can’t order full containers.

Asian manufacturers see the wisdom of this strategy and may be following suit. But they apparently want to take it a step further by having some manufacturing here. Whether that’s case goods finishing, repair or light assembly, or even full-fledged upholstery manufacturing, is anyone’s guess.

But having some sort of U.S. operation could help Asian companies prosper in three key ways. First, it would diversify their global manufacturing portfolio. Second, it would put them closer to the U.S. market and thus allow them to respond more quickly to their U.S. customers. Third, it could help offset such things as rising fuel costs, fluctuating currency rates and ongoing administrative reviews for antidumping duties.

How this plays out remains to be seen. There doesn’t appear to be any deals on the horizon. But one Lexington, N.C.-based economic developer noted he had at least two foreign manufacturing prospects come to town recently, including one weekend-long visit. He wouldn’t say much more than that, except that he would be getting more and more quiet as any deal progressed.

Should any of this concern domestic producers already struggling to hold on to the last of their manufacturing base?

Perhaps. But it also points to an opportunity. If Asian manufacturers need a domestic facility to serve adequately the U.S. market, then U.S. manufacturers, which have such facilities in place, should occupy an enviable position in the marketplace. Those that can use those facilities most effectively will be the ones with the best shot at success.

Posted by Tom Russell on May 24, 2006 | Comments (28)

January 7, 2013
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
Samtoro commented:

Me and this article, stiitng in a tree, L-E-A-R-N-I-N-G!


December 23, 2009
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
kino-nu commented:

Кино-Ню - порно онлайн, смотреть порно бесплатно, порно тв
Все юмористические передачи на видео
Попка-Vip - порно портал


September 25, 2009
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
xx-vip commented:

XXX-Vip Video - порно ролики видео онлайн только для www.furnituretoday.com


September 28, 2007
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
Nick commented:

What a beautiful website!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!
Hi! I completely agree with your opinion!

Good bue!


January 22, 2007
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
[3!]fiva, [3!]fiva commented:

Cool project! Thanks!, Cool project! Thanks!


December 24, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
cantant, cantant commented:

good site, good site


December 23, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
sarde, sarde commented:

Excellent browsing have the to, Excellent browsing have the to


December 21, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
ware, ware commented:

great site, great site


December 6, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
Clark commented:

What a beautiful website!
Visit my site.

Good bue!


December 1, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
gimi commented:

Very interesting.


December 1, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
gimi commented:

While site keep Good work


December 1, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
gimi commented:

Excellent browsing have the to


December 1, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
gimi commented:

good site


November 26, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
f commented:

fff


November 23, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
Alex commented:

What a beautiful website!
h


November 19, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
solsol commented:

great site


November 16, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
monmon commented:

Good Site .Nice work.


November 13, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
bill nc commented:

great


November 13, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
joe sixpack commented:

good


November 13, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
bill commented:

this is cool


October 27, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
sausau commented:

Beautiful site!


October 4, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
$name commented:

Very nice site!


October 2, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
hdwluxoai vpybo commented:

vqgptsudk axbqurf jfmox tnymjezh bzmwdine asyipxo fyxlok


September 7, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
phenterminekrosavcheg1 commented:

Hi Nice Book


September 6, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
Mandy Candy commented:

I would like to wish you much luck. And a lot of money. Thank you.


August 28, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
Neal Majong commented:

Very many thanks for a good work. Nice and useful. Like it!


June 13, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
kathleen fasanella commented:

Interesting...we're seeing the same trend in the apparel industry. Companies who moved off shore are looking to move back in.


May 26, 2006
In response to: Why offshore producers want facilities in U.S.
E.R. commented:

First off Tom, Congrats on winning American Idol!
The premise of your article is sound. However, it makes no sense to open a warehouse in North Carolina. Offshore producers do need US warehouses, but none of the smart ones are going to incur the costs and delays of moving goods to the Highpoint area.
Why pay around $500 a single 40 foot high cube to come to this area when you could locate in areas like Charleston, Savannah, Seattle, LA or any port town were containers flow. We must look past the old paradigms of the Furniture Industry if you hope to succeed in the new world order.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
getting most out of leads
Advertisement
FT Industry Resources module
eNewsletters
eletter_callout_box_FT2


About Us   |   Advertise   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2013 Sandow Media LLC.All rights reserved.
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy